Skip to main content

Mediation vs. Conciliation: Which Approach Fits Your Dispute?

Mediation vs Conciliation: Which Approach Fits Your Dispute?

Mediation vs Concilation | Mediation Centre Jaipur | Mediation Bill | Mediation in ADR | Mediation process | Mediation Act | Mediation in law |  Mediation services 


Mediation and conciliation are two words that frequently appear in the context of dispute resolution. While they share the goal of peaceful conflict resolution, their methods and nuances make them unique approaches. Understanding the distinctions between mediation and conciliation is the first step in selecting the best course of action for your issue. In this thorough tutorial, we'll delve into the subtleties of mediation and conciliation, their distinctive qualities, and how a center like "" may help you make a decision that's appropriate for your particular circumstance.

Defining Mediation and Conciliation


Mediation is a cooperative procedure where a mediator, or impartial third party, helps disputing parties communicate and negotiate. The mediator works with the parties to clarify difficulties, consider potential solutions, and finally come to a mutually satisfactory agreement. Being voluntary and self-determined, mediation is renowned for allowing the parties to maintain control over the end result.


Conciliation, on the other hand, is a facilitated dispute resolution procedure that also involves a conciliator, a neutral third party. In conciliation, the conciliator plays a more active role in putting forward alternatives and assisting the parties in reaching a compromise. Contrary to mediation, conciliation can necessitate more conciliator intervention even though it still emphasizes cooperation and agreeable solutions..

Key Differences Between Mediation and Conciliation

1. Role of the Neutral Third Party:

   - Mediation: The mediator facilitates communication and assists parties in coming up with their own ideas.

   - Conciliation: The conciliator takes on a more active role, assisting the parties and presenting viable resolutions.

2. Voluntariness:

   - Mediation: Parties willingly participate in the process and have control over the outcome.

   - Conciliation: At specific situations, conciliation may be required, and the resulting agreement may be more strongly influenced by the conciliation process.

3. Nature of Agreement:

   - Mediation: The parties agree on parameters that suit their needs and interests and are often more enduring.

   - Conciliation: The conciliator might have more influence over the agreement's design, which might speed up the resolution.

4. Legal Enforceability:

   - Mediation: According to the jurisdiction and the desires of the parties, mediation agreements may or may not be enforceable in court.

   - Conciliation: A lot of the time, conciliation agreements are enforceable in court and have legal effect.

Choosing the Right Approach with

"" Mediation Services understands that every dispute is unique, and the choice between mediation and conciliation should align with the parties' goals and the nature of the conflict. Here's how "" can assist:

1. Assessment: "" conducts a thorough assessment of your dispute, considering factors such as the parties' preferences, the complexity of the issues, and the desired level of control.

2. Customized Approach: Based on the assessment, "" tailors the approach to best suit your needs, whether it's mediation, conciliation, or a hybrid of both.

3. Experienced Neutrals: The center employs experienced mediators and conciliators who excel in their respective roles, ensuring a high level of expertise in guiding the process. 

Equa.Law: We at conflict resolution platform are dedicated to providing mediation and worldwide alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as speedy and successful solutions to settle disputes. Our platform serves as a dependable and impartial forum where individuals, communities, and groups may settle disputes amicably and constructively.

Best online platform for resolving disputes through Online Dispute Resolution mechanism.


According to the nature of your issue, your interests, and the degree of involvement you wish, you should choose between mediation and conciliation. Both strategies provide helpful resources for reaching amicable agreements. You may make an informed decision that fits your particular circumstances by comprehending the differences described in this guide and obtaining the advice of professionals like those at "" Mediation Services. This will ultimately lead to an efficient and amicable dispute resolution. Remember that the key to a successful and satisfactory resolution of your disagreement is to select the strategy that best meets your demands.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.


Subscribe our web Equa.Law and get latest update of Mediation.

Popular Posts

‘Negotiation’ vs ‘Mediation’ vs ‘Arbitration’

An alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is a method used to resolve issues without resorting to a court case. The different methods of doing so under the ADR umbrella include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. This article explores the different methods and tries to explain to the readers the pros and cons of the same.  Starting with Mediation, the term "mediation" refers to the procedure wherein parties to a dispute are helped to resolve their differences by a neutral third party that does not favour one side).  The neutral third person is known as the 'mediator', and the mediator helps the parties communicate by acting as the communicator between the two parties. The mediator controls the flow of information between the parties in a reasonable, transparent, and unbiased manner.  The mediators don't take sides, offer counsel, or offer legal advice to any parties. They do not serve in either of these capacities. They help by outlining the points of contention

Scope & Importance of ADR

The mechanism of ADR System and its techniques are an extra-judicial remedy to resolve disputes outside the legal fora. These techniques can be used in all those cases, which are capable of being resolved, under law, by mutual agreement between the parties. The scope of ADR is wider and can cover cases of civil nature, commercial, industrial and family disputes or any other cases of urgent nature. The ADR works across the full range of business disputes: banking; contract performance and interpretations, construction contracts, intellectual property rights, insurance coverage, conflicts in joint ventures, partnership differences, personal injury; product liability; professional liability, real estate, and securities. The mechanism of the ADR system may offer the best solution in commercial disputes of an international character. The scope of an ADR System is not intended to supplant existing means of dispute resolution. It offers only alternative options to litigation. There is a large

ADR: The legal necessity for Post Covid India

Name – Garvit Bhardwaj College - Faculty of Law, University of Delhi "Discourage litigation, persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point Out to them how the normal winner is often a loser in fees, expenses, cost and time"- These words of Abraham Lincon have passed the test of time as to how reduced litigation can be beneficial for society. But a highly commercialized and developing society like ours is bound to face disputes which shift the emphasis from avoiding litigation to providing faster means to resolve unavoidable conflicts. The unprecedented COVID-19 crisis is likely to lead to an upsurge in the number of cases before the judiciary. For instance, consumer, tenancy, and labor disputes are likely to see a rise soon and our judicial system stands incapable of handling them effectively. The Indian Judicial system, even after 75 years of independence, is still facing crippling backlogs and delays. Approximately 73,000 cases are pending before the Supreme