Skip to main content

ADR in Marital Disputes In India

Introduction
ADR i.e., Alternative Dispute Resolution, is a term that is often used nowadays, but what does it actually mean?
ADR, as the name suggests is the process of settling disputes between the parties without the intervention of a judicial institution or court. Basically, it is setting off the issue without going into the hectic process of litigation. Now the question arises of how this alternative method arose in India?
It was introduced in the 222nd report of the Law Commission of India[i], which states that ADR can resolve the problem of delays in the judgment, can reduce the cost of resolving disputes, and will also simplify the procedure by eliminating the technicalities of the litigation process.
It further states that courts are the only way for a common man to achieve justice, but there are barriers like poverty, illiteracy, and backwardness to such justice. And complexities of the litigation process and the cost of the same plays an important part in getting justice through the courts. As a result, the majority of Indian citizens are unable to exercise their legal or constitutional rights, which ultimately leads to inequality. And Article 39A[ii]states that the state shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen because of economic or other disabilities.
And due to these reasons, ADR was introduced as a remedy for the citizens.
 
ADR, an upcoming measure
We must have heard at least once about the Amazon case which gave limelight to the arbitration method of alternative dispute resolution, also ADR is commonly used in contractual breaches and we have heard the term ADR most of the time in the cases of a contractual breach between two big corporations. But an infamous field where ADR methods are used is marital disputes.
ADR not only aims at cost or time effectiveness but it helps in reducing the burden of the court, of the litigation sector by resolving the disputes through a third party, outside the court. This method of settling a dispute without litigation interference has made a shift from court to this method. ADR has cooperation as its base as a third party tries its best to help the involved parties cooperate and come to a mutual solution.
Arbitration and Mediation in family matters
In India solving marital disputes through alternative dispute resolution is not a new thing, in the earlier times, Panchayat Raj was there, whose decisions used to be binding on the parties even in personal matters as the “Panchs” used to hold the supreme authority in those times.
Today, arbitration and mediation are used to settle marriage-related disputes like separation, divorce, etc.
Arbitration is an informal process where a party i.e., a neutral third party is appointed to settle the dispute between the parties. In a divorce matter, the arbitrator appointed by the parties listens to them privately. This maintains the privacy of matter between the parties only, while on the other hand such extent of privacy can’t be maintained during a regular court proceeding. Also, people prefer methods of ADR to solve their disputes quickly, and also it is cost-effective. After hearing the parties, the arbitrator comes to a decision.
In mediation, unlike arbitration, instead of rendering a decision, mediators facilitate the settlement of disagreements or conflicts between the parties. Here, open communication takes place between the parties to avoid any kind of misunderstanding or miscommunication, the mediator hears both the parties and concludes.
In today’s world, where marriage is no more only a non-dissoluble sacred bond rather it has fallen more on the side of a contract. As it is no longer considered indissoluble, divorces have become common. People want to solve their marital problems as fast as they can and with utmost privacy as these issues include sensitive information which is not supposed to come out. Also, family reputation is included in these matters and that’s why the family wants to maintain secrecy in these matters. And arbitration and mediation are the methods that completely suit this position. The meetings conducted can be flexible according to the needs of the parties.
In the case, K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa[iii], the second issue which was answered was how the issue could be handled in a better way?                                                                        In response to it, it was said that “10-15% of the matrimonial cases sent for court-directed mediation get resolved. If the parties in the present case, would have tried to resolve the dispute at the onset itself, things wouldn’t have been this ugly. For this, the court suggested the process of mediation. Where the parties could have taken the help of a neutral person help to understand the dispute better and arrived at an amicable solution. The court referred to section 9 of the Family Courts Act and said that mediation should be made compulsory in disputes where settlement is possible.”
This statement by the Apex court clearly states that ADR methods can solve the matter easily and at an earlier stage itself.
Conclusion
Recent years have seen a rise in the use of mediation to resolve separation and divorce cases. A mediator is asked to be "in the midst" of individuals in conflict, in contrast to a lawyer who is prepared to represent one client and offer to advise. You bargain amicably with one another thanks to the help of mediators who facilitate dialogues. Without the mediator taking sides or imposing any binding conclusions, you resolve your disputes by creating an agreement that is agreeable to both parties.
Even with a mediator's assistance, conversations that are facilitated are not always successful or guaranteed. To create a safe environment, mediators must interview each client to determine whether they are willing and able to bargain honestly. By that, I mean being prepared to acknowledge the validity of the opposing viewpoint and to work with the other party to come to terms that satisfy everyone's needs, not just your own.
Though the process involves privacy the parties feel discomfort in telling their issues to an outsider, in a third person, on the other hand, they trust more on the courts while telling their issues because still the concept of mediation and arbitration is not so famous in India, there is still a long journey ahead.


[i] Law Commission of India, Need for Justice-dispensation through ADR etc., (Law Com. No. 222 2009) 14
 < https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report222.pdf>
[ii] INDIA CONST.art.39A
[iii] K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, ((2013) 5 Supreme Court Cases 226: AIR 2013 SC 2176)

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Newsletter

Subscribe our web Equa.Law and get latest update of Mediation.

Popular Posts

‘Negotiation’ vs ‘Mediation’ vs ‘Arbitration’

An alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is a method used to resolve issues without resorting to a court case. The different methods of doing so under the ADR umbrella include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. This article explores the different methods and tries to explain to the readers the pros and cons of the same.  Starting with Mediation, the term "mediation" refers to the procedure wherein parties to a dispute are helped to resolve their differences by a neutral third party that does not favour one side).  The neutral third person is known as the 'mediator', and the mediator helps the parties communicate by acting as the communicator between the two parties. The mediator controls the flow of information between the parties in a reasonable, transparent, and unbiased manner.  The mediators don't take sides, offer counsel, or offer legal advice to any parties. They do not serve in either of these capacities. They help by outlining the points of contention

Fast Track Arbitration in India

In recent years, users and practitioners of international arbitration have raised criticism as regards the length of the arbitration proceedings. Insofar as businesses strive for efficiency, several national arbitration acts and institutional arbitration rules have provided for fast track arbitration (also known as expedited arbitration). ● The Geneva chamber of commerce and industry was the first arbitral institution to introduce rules for expedited procedures in its arbitration rules of 1992, and in 2017, the international chamber of commerce introduced an expedited procedure in its arbitration rules. ● Fast track arbitration can be defined as a full arbitration process compressed into a shorter period for a quicker resolution of the dispute. ● The conditions for the application of a fast-track arbitration vary in each jurisdiction and arbitral institution but have notably in common to apply when the amount in dispute does not exceed a certain threshold. ● Parties can also “o

Scope & Importance of ADR

The mechanism of ADR System and its techniques are an extra-judicial remedy to resolve disputes outside the legal fora. These techniques can be used in all those cases, which are capable of being resolved, under law, by mutual agreement between the parties. The scope of ADR is wider and can cover cases of civil nature, commercial, industrial and family disputes or any other cases of urgent nature. The ADR works across the full range of business disputes: banking; contract performance and interpretations, construction contracts, intellectual property rights, insurance coverage, conflicts in joint ventures, partnership differences, personal injury; product liability; professional liability, real estate, and securities. The mechanism of the ADR system may offer the best solution in commercial disputes of an international character. The scope of an ADR System is not intended to supplant existing means of dispute resolution. It offers only alternative options to litigation. There is a large