Skip to main content

Enforcement and Execution of the award

In India, the enforcement and execution of arbitral awards, both domestic and foreign, are governed by the Act read with the CPC. While the former lays down the substantive law governing enforceability and execution of an award, the latter deals with the procedures required to be followed when seeking execution of an award.
According to Section 35 of the Act, an arbitral award shall be final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them. According to Section 35 of the Act, an arbitral award shall be final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them. Thus, an arbitral award becomes immediately enforceable unless challenged under Section 34 of the Act. When the period for filing objections has expired or objections have been rejected, the award can be enforced under the CPC in the same manner as if it were a decree passed by a court of law. An ex parte award passed by an Arbitral Tribunal under Section 28 of the Act is also enforceable under Section 36. 
Even a settlement reached by the parties under Section 30 of the Act can be enforced under Section 36 of the Act as if it were a decree of the court.
Institution of Execution Petition
For the execution of an arbitral award, the procedure as laid down in Order XXI of the CPC has to be followed. Order XXI of the CPC lays down the detailed procedure for enforcement of decrees. It is pertinent to note that Order XXI of the CPC is the longest order in the schedule of the CPC consisting of 106 Rules. Where enforcement of an arbitral award is sought under Order XXI CPC by a decree-holder, the legal position as to objections to it is clear. At the stage of execution of the arbitral award, there can be no challenge as to its validity.
The execution proceedings of an award can be filed anywhere in the country, and there is no requirement for obtaining a transfer of the decree from the court which exercised jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings. The court executing the decree cannot go beyond the decree and between the parties or their representatives. It ought to take the decree according to its tenor and cannot entertain any objection that the decree was incorrect in law or in facts. All proceedings in execution are commenced by an application for execution.
The execution of a decree against the property of the judgment debtor can be effected in two ways
I. Attachment of property; and
II. Sale of property of the judgment debtor.
The courts have been granted discretion to impose conditions prior to granting a stay, including a direction for deposit. The amended section also states that where the time for making an application under Section 34 has expired, then, subject to the provisions of the CPC, the award can be enforced. Also, the mere fact that an application for setting aside an arbitral award has been filed in the court does not itself render the award unenforceable unless the court grants a stay in accordance with the provisions of subsection 3, in a separate application. It is the discretion of the court to impose such conditions as it deems fit while deciding the stay application.
Attachment of Property
Attachable property’ belonging to a judgment debtor may be divided into two classes: (i) moveable property and (ii) immovable property.
If the property is immoveable, the attachment is to be made by an order prohibiting the judgment debtor from transferring or charging the property in any way and prohibiting all other persons from taking any benefit from such a transfer or charge. The order must be proclaimed at some place on or adjacent to the property and a copy of the order is to be affixed on a conspicuous part of the property and upon a conspicuous part of the courthouse.
Where an attachment has been made, any private transfer of property attached, whether it be movable or immovable, is void as against all claims enforceable under the attachment. If during the pendency of the attachment, the judgment debtor satisfies the decree through the court, the attachment will be deemed to be withdrawn. Otherwise, the court will order the property to be sold.
Order XXI lays down a detailed procedure for the sale of attached property whether movable or immovable. If the property attached is a moveable property, which is subject to speedy and natural decay, it may be sold at once under Rule 43. Every sale in execution of a decree should be conducted by an officer of the court except where the property to be sold is a negotiable instrument or a share in a corporation which the court may order to be sold through a broker.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.


Subscribe our web Equa.Law and get latest update of Mediation.

Popular Posts

‘Negotiation’ vs ‘Mediation’ vs ‘Arbitration’

An alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is a method used to resolve issues without resorting to a court case. The different methods of doing so under the ADR umbrella include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. This article explores the different methods and tries to explain to the readers the pros and cons of the same.  Starting with Mediation, the term "mediation" refers to the procedure wherein parties to a dispute are helped to resolve their differences by a neutral third party that does not favour one side).  The neutral third person is known as the 'mediator', and the mediator helps the parties communicate by acting as the communicator between the two parties. The mediator controls the flow of information between the parties in a reasonable, transparent, and unbiased manner.  The mediators don't take sides, offer counsel, or offer legal advice to any parties. They do not serve in either of these capacities. They help by outlining the points of contention

Scope & Importance of ADR

The mechanism of ADR System and its techniques are an extra-judicial remedy to resolve disputes outside the legal fora. These techniques can be used in all those cases, which are capable of being resolved, under law, by mutual agreement between the parties. The scope of ADR is wider and can cover cases of civil nature, commercial, industrial and family disputes or any other cases of urgent nature. The ADR works across the full range of business disputes: banking; contract performance and interpretations, construction contracts, intellectual property rights, insurance coverage, conflicts in joint ventures, partnership differences, personal injury; product liability; professional liability, real estate, and securities. The mechanism of the ADR system may offer the best solution in commercial disputes of an international character. The scope of an ADR System is not intended to supplant existing means of dispute resolution. It offers only alternative options to litigation. There is a large

ADR: The legal necessity for Post Covid India

Name – Garvit Bhardwaj College - Faculty of Law, University of Delhi "Discourage litigation, persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point Out to them how the normal winner is often a loser in fees, expenses, cost and time"- These words of Abraham Lincon have passed the test of time as to how reduced litigation can be beneficial for society. But a highly commercialized and developing society like ours is bound to face disputes which shift the emphasis from avoiding litigation to providing faster means to resolve unavoidable conflicts. The unprecedented COVID-19 crisis is likely to lead to an upsurge in the number of cases before the judiciary. For instance, consumer, tenancy, and labor disputes are likely to see a rise soon and our judicial system stands incapable of handling them effectively. The Indian Judicial system, even after 75 years of independence, is still facing crippling backlogs and delays. Approximately 73,000 cases are pending before the Supreme