Skip to main content

The ODR Process



The primary purpose of ODR is to allow the parties to resolve their dispute with the use of electronic technology. It may occur in “real time” or unroll in an asynchronous manner, depending on the rules of the ODR Provider, as well as the wishes of the parties. Often, this process is more convenient and cost efficient than face to face meetings in order to negotiate, mediate, or otherwise resolve existing disputes.
The actual terms of the agreement that the parties come to can be as broad or as specific as the parties desire, particularly if the matter is concluded at the negotiation or mediation phase. The enforceability of the settlement agreement may depend on the rules and jurisdiction of the ODR Provider, particularly if the dispute is international.

ODR PROCESS
Much depends on the rules of the ODR Provider, and whether or not the ODR component will take place at the negotiation, mediation or adjudication phase. 
Generally, the ODR process will begin with contacting the other party to resolve the dispute, either directly or through the ODR Neutral.
The process of an ODR proceeding may consist of stages including: negotiation; facilitated settlement; and a third (final) stage. 
 When a claimant submits a notice through the ODR platform to the ODR administrator , the ODR administrator informs the respondent of the existence of the claim and the claimant of the response. The first stage of proceedings — a technology-enabled negotiation — commences, in which the claimant and respondent negotiate directly with one another through the ODR platform.
If that negotiation process fails (i.e. does not result in a settlement of the claim), the process may move to a second, “facilitated settlement” stage . In that stage of ODR proceedings, the ODR administrator appoints a neutral, who communicates with the parties in an attempt to reach a settlement.
 If facilitated settlement fails, a third and final stage of ODR proceedings may commence, in which case the ODR administrator or neutral may inform the parties of the nature of such a stage. 

Commencement of ODR proceedings

 In order that an ODR proceeding may begin, it is desirable that
the claimant provide to the ODR administrator a notice containing
the following information:

(a) The name and electronic address of the claimant and of
the claimant’s representative (if any) authorized to act for the claimant in the ODR proceedings;
(b) The name and electronic address of the respondent and
of the respondent’s representative (if any) known to the claimant;
(c) The grounds on which the claim is made;
(d) Any solutions proposed to resolve the dispute;
(e) The claimant’s preferred language of proceedings; and
(f) The signature or other means of identification and authentication of the claimant and/or the claimant’s representative.

ODR proceedings may be deemed to have commenced when, following a claimant’s communication of a notice to the ODR administrator, the ODR administrator notifies the parties that the notice is available at the ODR platform.

It is desirable that the respondent communicate its response to the ODR administrator within a reasonable time of being notified of the availability of the claimant’s notice on the ODR platform, and that the response include the following elements:
(a) The name and electronic address of the respondent and the respondent’s representative (if any) authorized to act for the respondent in the ODR  proceedings;
(b) A response to the grounds on which the claim is made;
(c) Any solutions proposed to resolve the dispute;
(d) The signature or other means of identification and authentication of the respondent and/or the respondent’s representative; and
(e) Notice of any counterclaim containing the grounds on which the counterclaim is made.

As much as is possible, it is desirable that both the notice and response be accompanied by all documents and other evidence relied upon by each party, or contain references to them. In addition, to the extent that a claimant is pursuing any other legal remedies, it is desirable that such information also be provided with the notice.


 Negotiation

 The first stage may be a negotiation, conducted between the parties via the ODR platform.
 The first stage of proceedings may commence following the communication of the respondent’s response to the ODR platform and:
(a) Notification thereof to the claimant; or
(b) Failing a response, the lapse of a reasonable period of time after the notice has been communicated to the respondent.

 It is desirable that, if the negotiation does not result in a settlement within a reasonable period of time, the process proceeds to the next stage.

 Facilitated settlement
 
The second stage of ODR proceedings may be facilitated settlement, whereby a neutral is appointed and communicates with the parties to try to achieve a settlement.

That stage may commence if negotiation via the platform fails for any reason (including non-participation or failure to reach a settlement within a reasonable period of time), or where one or both parties to the dispute request to move directly to the next stage of
proceedings.

Upon commencement of the facilitated settlement stage of proceedings, it is desirable that the ODR administrator appoint a neutral, and notify the parties of that appointment, and provide certain details about the identity of the neutral below.

In the facilitated settlement stage, it is desirable that the neutral communicate with the parties to try to achieve a settlement.
 If a facilitated settlement cannot be achieved within a reasonable period of time, the process may move to a final stage.

 Final stage

 If the neutral has not succeeded in facilitating the settlement, it is desirable that the ODR administrator or neutral informs the parties of the nature of the final stage, and of the form that it might take.


The concept of ODR in India is at a nascent stage. The NITI Aayog had constituted a high level committee to take it forward and the report of the Committee released on 29.11.2021 inter-alia recovers for mainstreaming of ODR in India, as a cost effective, convenient, efficient process which can be customized to the specific needs of the parties. The Ministry of Law & Justice is taking proactive steps to ensure that the state level initiatives by NITI Aayog are given proper support. In this regard the govt. is giving due support to the Online Dispute Management platforms.


Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Newsletter

Subscribe our web Equa.Law and get latest update of Mediation.

Popular Posts

‘Negotiation’ vs ‘Mediation’ vs ‘Arbitration’

An alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is a method used to resolve issues without resorting to a court case. The different methods of doing so under the ADR umbrella include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. This article explores the different methods and tries to explain to the readers the pros and cons of the same.  Starting with Mediation, the term "mediation" refers to the procedure wherein parties to a dispute are helped to resolve their differences by a neutral third party that does not favour one side).  The neutral third person is known as the 'mediator', and the mediator helps the parties communicate by acting as the communicator between the two parties. The mediator controls the flow of information between the parties in a reasonable, transparent, and unbiased manner.  The mediators don't take sides, offer counsel, or offer legal advice to any parties. They do not serve in either of these capacities. They help by outlining the points of contention ...

Fast Track Arbitration in India

In recent years, users and practitioners of international arbitration have raised criticism as regards the length of the arbitration proceedings. Insofar as businesses strive for efficiency, several national arbitration acts and institutional arbitration rules have provided for fast track arbitration (also known as expedited arbitration). ● The Geneva chamber of commerce and industry was the first arbitral institution to introduce rules for expedited procedures in its arbitration rules of 1992, and in 2017, the international chamber of commerce introduced an expedited procedure in its arbitration rules. ● Fast track arbitration can be defined as a full arbitration process compressed into a shorter period for a quicker resolution of the dispute. ● The conditions for the application of a fast-track arbitration vary in each jurisdiction and arbitral institution but have notably in common to apply when the amount in dispute does not exceed a certain threshold. ● Parties can also “o...

Scope & Importance of ADR

The mechanism of ADR System and its techniques are an extra-judicial remedy to resolve disputes outside the legal fora. These techniques can be used in all those cases, which are capable of being resolved, under law, by mutual agreement between the parties. The scope of ADR is wider and can cover cases of civil nature, commercial, industrial and family disputes or any other cases of urgent nature. The ADR works across the full range of business disputes: banking; contract performance and interpretations, construction contracts, intellectual property rights, insurance coverage, conflicts in joint ventures, partnership differences, personal injury; product liability; professional liability, real estate, and securities. The mechanism of the ADR system may offer the best solution in commercial disputes of an international character. The scope of an ADR System is not intended to supplant existing means of dispute resolution. It offers only alternative options to litigation. There is a large...